4 free agents the Chiefs should happily let leave

KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI - JANUARY 29: JuJu Smith-Schuster #9 of the Kansas City Chiefs runs during the AFC Championship NFL football game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Cincinnati Bengals at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium on January 29, 2023 in Kansas City, Missouri. (Photo by Michael Owens/Getty Images)
KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI - JANUARY 29: JuJu Smith-Schuster #9 of the Kansas City Chiefs runs during the AFC Championship NFL football game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Cincinnati Bengals at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium on January 29, 2023 in Kansas City, Missouri. (Photo by Michael Owens/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
3 of 4
Next
Chiefs offseason rumors, Carlos Dunlap
Nov 27, 2022; Kansas City, Missouri, USA; Kansas City Chiefs defensive end Carlos Dunlap (8) after defeating the Los Angeles Rams at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jay Biggerstaff-USA TODAY Sports /

2. Carlos Dunlap

Signing Dunlap to a one-year, $8 million deal this offseason was a worthwhile gamble by the Chiefs’ front office. The veteran edge rusher repaid the team’s faith by giving them five valuable sacks in a reserve role.

The emergence of rookie George Karlaftis as a quality starter should free the Chiefs up to shop for a cheaper backup option in the offseason. The team could even elect to spend another high draft choice on an edge rusher to further insulate themselves against age-related decline from Frank Clark. Dunlap isn’t at the right stage of his career to give Kansas City that kind of insurance as he heads into his age-35 season.

In fairness to Dunlap, he’s been a perfectly adequate pass-rushing specialist this year. The problem is that he’s going to be looking for starter-level money as he hits the open market. This is almost certainly his last opportunity to garner a big free-agent deal.

Kansas City has more pressing needs on their roster than to give Dunlap another big contract. Signing him to a sizeable one-year deal last offseason wasn’t a mistake, but doing it again would represent a costly error by the team’s front office.