FanDuel daily picks: Fantasy basketball lineup-January 17

Jan 16, 2016; Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Los Angeles Lakers forward Julius Randle (30) dribbles against Utah Jazz center Jeff Withey (24) during the second half at Vivint Smart Home Arena. The Jazz won 109-82. Mandatory Credit: Russ Isabella-USA TODAY Sports
Jan 16, 2016; Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Los Angeles Lakers forward Julius Randle (30) dribbles against Utah Jazz center Jeff Withey (24) during the second half at Vivint Smart Home Arena. The Jazz won 109-82. Mandatory Credit: Russ Isabella-USA TODAY Sports /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
12 of 12
Next
Jan 16, 2016; Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Los Angeles Lakers forward Julius Randle (30) dribbles against Utah Jazz center Jeff Withey (24) during the second half at Vivint Smart Home Arena. The Jazz won 109-82. Mandatory Credit: Russ Isabella-USA TODAY Sports
Jan 16, 2016; Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Los Angeles Lakers forward Julius Randle (30) dribbles against Utah Jazz center Jeff Withey (24) during the second half at Vivint Smart Home Arena. The Jazz won 109-82. Mandatory Credit: Russ Isabella-USA TODAY Sports /

My FanDuel Daily Picks Lineup

PG:

Tyler Johnson-Miami Heat

PG:

Tony Parker-San Antonio Spurs

SG:

Monta Ellis-Indiana Pacers

SG:

Louis Williams-Los Angeles Lakers

SF:

Danilo Gallinari-Denver Nuggets

SF:

Kevin Durant-Oklahoma City Thunder

PF:

LaMarcus Aldridge-San Antonio Spurs

PF:

Julius Randle-Los Angeles Lakers

C:

Hassan Whiteside-Miami Heat

Recent Results: From January 2-15, here is how my picks did. All numbers are fantasy points per 1,000 in salary.

5-star picks (36 picks): 4.398
4-star picks (100 picks): 4.608
3-star picks (159 picks): 4.381
2-star picks (122 picks): 4.600
1-star picks (36 picks): 3.734

Explanation of the stars after each pick:  Each one of my picks is ranked for the day on a scale of one to five stars. The more stars that a pick receives represents the more confident I am in that selection. Picks that I give five stars (∗∗∗∗∗) are players that you almost have to own and I have no reservations about owning at their price.  Players that get four stars (∗∗∗∗) are players that I think are strong picks to build your roster around.  Three-star players (∗∗∗) are middle-of-the-road solid picks who are fairly reliable to produce a good game. Picks receiving two stars (∗∗) are high-risk, high-reward players who do offer enough upside to be in my picks, but also have a significant risk factor that makes them dangerous.  One star (∗) players are picks that are the best option around that price point, but who I don’t think are great options.  I would take any one-star player over any option not in my picks, but they aren’t picks I would build my roster around.

If you have any feedback on the new star system or any other formatting changes that would be helpful to you, feel free to reach out on Twitter or in the comments section at the bottom of the page.