Could The NHL Last More Than One Season?
By Tim Redinger
Can the two sides recover from an entire years lockout? There are some that think the NHL will be fine, its too large and global a product to simply dry up over a labor dispute – but if there is one sport that can ill afford multiple lengthy lockouts its the NHL.
Revenues have grown since the last lockout – the league is healthy in most markets. The important issue however, is pointed out via Twitter by TSNs Bob Mackenzie:
"Owners think players will cave, players think owners will cave."
As pointed out in the article however, Mackenzie goes on to use his hockey wisdom like a crystal ball:
"Biggest fear, and maybe this is why it won’t last all season, is if it goes whole season, prospects of 2nd season being affected are high IMO."
If you can think back to just prior to his departure to his home country to play, Alex Ovechkin had similar comments.
"If the league continues to insist on their [demands], then it will take a full year. That’s because we are not going to cave in. Then I will spend the entire season in the KHL. It’s an absolute reality."
Players are bracing for the long haul, and with other avenues to play hockey – there really isn’t an urgency for them to concede and sign any deal the NHL throws at them.
Hockey will always remain. It’s too much of an engrained culture for most of Europe and North America. Hell – there are even hockey leagues in Australia and Asia. The NHL would not be the first, nor will it be the last high professional league in North America to button up its doors.
When you weigh those facts out – it truly is the fans that are forced to suffer when it comes to the NHL lockout.