This afternoon, NBA TV will be announcing this yearās Hall of Fame inductees. Before they get a chance to do that, I sat down with the staff at FanSided and talked about this yearās most deserving candidates. Todayās roundtable features Brad Rowland, Reece Hooker, Ben Beecken and myself.
1. Is Gary Payton a lock for the first ballot?
Seerat: I wonāt say lock, solely because stranger things have happened in the Hall of Fame voting process than the idea of the Glove not getting in right away. However, if I had a vote, heād definitely get mine. Payton, unlike any other elite point guard in the history of the league, could shut down any transition player in the game. Including Michael Jordan. Donāt believe me? Watch the 1996 NBA Finals. For the first time ever, I noticed that his Airness was actually visibly frustrated by a perimeter defender. Sure, the Bulls would still go on to win the series, but when it comes to facing up against MJ, there isnāt a greater moral victory than even temporarily slowing him down.
Ben: A lock? I hesitate to use the word ālockā, but thereās no question he should get in this year. Certainly a top-40 player in NBA history, his Sonics were perennial contenders in the 1990ās in large part due to Paytonās stellar defense and steady offensive proficiency. Hereās

hoping that the RINGZ crowd will resist staging a protest, as Payton only lead Seattle to the NBA Finals once and the Western Conference Finals one other time before winning a title with the Miami Heat and Dwyane Wade in 2006. Verdict: yes, he will get in this year. I just hesitate to call him a ālockā.
2. What about Jerry Reinsdorf?
Seerat: Hereās the thing with Jerry: Heās either overrated or underrated, depending on who youāre talking to. If weāve learned anything from the Lebron/Dan Gilbert/comic-sans era, itās that being gifted with the best player in the league doesnāt mean anything if you canāt surround him with the right talent. Let me start by saying this: Scottie Pippen was not an easy find. The Bulls may have lucked out considering how great really turned out, but the ownership had been tracking him for an entire season. Their sole reason for trading up in the 1987 NBA Draft was to grab Pippen. In fact, the only reason he was drafted so high was because he wowed teams in his workouts. The Bulls though, had known about him for far longer. Horace Grant, and notable role-playerās such as B.J. Armstrong were all acquired through the draft.
Aside from that, the ownership always surrounded the duo with the right guys. Signing role players like Paxson, Cartwright and Kerr played a definite role in the teamās championship runs.
Fast-forward ten years: they drafted Derrick Rose, Joakim Noah and Luol Deng, the teamās foundation. As a Bulls fan, Iām no fan of Jerry Reinsdorf penny-pinching his way away from the luxury tax, but I canāt deny that he deserves to be enshrined in Springfield. Anyways, Iāll show myself out of this question before you all start questioning me about why I know so much about the history of a dynasty that was conceived before I was born.
Ben: Reinsdorf might get into the Hall this year, but I would not vote for him. Yes, the Bulls continue to be a profit machine and Reinsdorf oversaw Jordanās Bulls and six championships in the 1990ās, but letās not pretend that Reinsdorf had much more responsibility than signing the checks when it came to the Bullsā roster. His handling of the talent on the roster and coach Phil Jackson was iffy at best when the Bulls neared the end of their run of titles, and there seems to be little argument forĀ his induction outside of the Jordan/Pippen championships. Verdict: a coin-flip. Iām not sure I have a good handle on his legacy with the committee and voters, but he may get in simply because he was the owner of one of the NBAās great dynasties.
3. What about everyone else? Whoās in and whoās out?
Seerat: Upon a first glance, the nameās Vlade Divac, Bernard King and Mitch Richmond stand out. Letās not mince words here: Divac belongs in the Hall of Fame. If his NBA career, which is outstanding on its own, isnāt enough to get him in then his international resume should push him off the ledge. Remember, itās the basketball Hall of Fame⦠not the NBA Hall of Fame. And like, he was flopping before it was cool, so that counts for some points too. Originally nominated in 2004, Bernard King has yet to find his way into the hall. I canāt say that I think something will change the voters mind this year, although I wish they would. As far as Mitch Richmond goes, heās probably going to have to wait another year.
Ben: Bernard King remains on the ballot and may still get into the Hall. Vlade Divac is on the ballot for the first time, and he should absolutely be inducted, and maybe even this year. His impact in beginning a steady of stream of European players that have entered the NBA cannot be overstated. Tim Hardaway also has a shot to make it this year, but itās hard to see him making it before King. Referee Dick Bavetta stands a chance, simply because heās officiated the most games of anyone in history, but there seems to be enough mystery and suspicion surrounding portions of his career that I would stay away from voting for him. Overall, itās a tough class to pin down a ton of names from, and I would only confidently stick with Payton and Divac on my ballot.
Reece:Ā Aside from Payton, I think itās due time for New Yorkās own Bernand King and the late, great Vlade Divac to getĀ recognizedĀ Mitch Richmond probably deserves a call up too, earning a ton of accolades throughout his career including an Olympic gold medal, NBA title, Rookie of the Year and six All-Star appearances. Mendy Rudolph was picked in 2007, and Bavetta has eclipsed his record for games officiated and incredibly has not missed an assignment game in 38 years. Steve Nash was a one year old. Let that sink it.