Adrian Peterson Rips NFL Disciplinary Process
By Josh Sanchez
Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson is waiting to learn if and when he can return to the team. In the meantime, Peterson is denying a report that he blew off the NFL diciplinary hearing on Friday.
On Friday, a report surfaced that Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson skipped out on his disciplinary hearing with the NFL.
More from Minnesota Vikings
- Kirk Cousins trying to emulate Patrick Mahomes after seeing co-star on Netflix doc
- NFL rumors: Dalvin Cook gives another status update on RB’s free agency
- Vikings: Jordan Addison issues apology after reckless driving charge
- 3 biggest mistakes from the NFL offseason
- Patrick Mahomes is picking a fight with the Kirk Cousins haters
However, Peterson is denying those reports.
On Sunday morning, Peterson released a full statement giving his side of the story. In the statement, Peterson claims the report that he skipped the hearing is “not true” and he then went on to explain the advice he received and criticized the NFL for making up the entire situation as they go.
Here is the full statement:
"The report that I backed out of a meeting with the NFL is just not true. When Roger Goodell’s office asked that I attend the “hearing” on Friday, I consulted with my union and learned that this “hearing” was something new and inconsistent with the CBA. On Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday of this past week, my union sent emails, letters, and had conversations with his office on my behalf asking about the nature of the hearing, how it was to occur, who would participate, and its purpose.We repeatedly asked them to respond quickly to my questions because I want to cooperate and get back on the field, but they didn’t respond until late Wednesday evening, and even then they didn’t answer important questions about their proposed “hearing.” After consulting with the union, I told the NFL that I will attend the standard meeting with the Commissioner prior to possible imposition of discipline, as has been the long-term practice under the CBA, but I wouldn’t participate in a newly created and non-collectively bargained pre-discipline “hearing” that would include outside people I don’t know and who would have roles in the process that the NFL wouldn’t disclose.At this point, I’ve resolved my matter in the criminal court; I’ve worked to make amends for what I’ve done; I’ve missed most of the season, and I stand ready to be candid and forthcoming with Mr. Goodell about what happened. However, I will not allow the NFL to impose a new process of discipline on me, ignore the CBA, ignore the deal they agreed to with me, and behave without fairness or accountability. The process they are pushing is arbitrary, inconsistent, and contrary to what they agreed to do, and for those reasons, I never agreed to the hearing. I’m sorry for all of this, but I can’t excuse their refusal to be fair."
When Peterson initially agreed to the NFL commissioner’s exempt list, he did so with the belief he would be welcomed back when his legal issues were resolved.
Now that Peterson has reached a plea deal and put the child abuse situation behind him, he is hoping that he will be able to return to the league sooner rather than later. For the sake of everyone involved, this will hopefully get resolved soon.
More from FanSided
- NFL rumors: Aaron Rodgers sets Jets up for Super Bowl run with new contract
- MLB Trade Grades: Dodgers land Amed Rosario from Guardians
- Colorado gives Pac-12 a possible death knell with move to Big 12
- NFL rumors: Dalvin Cook suitor maintaining very ‘real’ interest
- Braves get dose of bad news on Max Fried as ace nears return