At this point, it would be a surprise if the Boston Celtics went with anyone other than Washington’s Markelle Fultz at No. 1 on draft night. There are arguments for other prospects like UCLA’s Lonzo Ball and Kansas wing Josh Jackson, but Fultz is a tier above those options because of his upside as a lead ball-handler in a league that increasingly prioritizes success at that position. Fultz’s offensive prowess has been investigated numerous times at this point, so what about the arguments against this pick?
For starters, there are questions about Fultz’s defense. He lagged behind with the Huskies and frequently lacked the necessary effort. However, in the NBA, high usage lead ball-handlers are rarely elite defensive talents. Steph Curry, James Harden and Russell Westbrook, for example, are frequently criticized due to their poor defensive play, but the value that these players contribute on the offensive end is so high that it simply matters less. All Fultz needs to do is try a bit harder and develop some additional fundamentals, two things that are well within his reach.
The other concern relates to Fultz’s fit next to Isaiah Thomas. The 5-foot-11 star is under contract for one more season and it’s expected he’ll cash in a big deal in free agency. Boston, though, could proceed without Thomas and build out its roster to compete after the LeBron James era, which is probably what they should do to maximize their chances of winning a title long-term.
Learn more about Markelle Fultz at The Step Back.