Advertisers spooked by a lack of U.S. team at the World Cup seemed to have, uh, forgotten what makes sports ads appealing.
If youāve been watching the World Cup in the United States through most legal means, youāve likely been subject to World Cup-related ads. If youāve been subject to World Cup-related ads, youāve likely noticed two things: 1) they are mostly bad, or rather, none of them are notably good, and 2) they tend to say the same thing: Americans need a team to root for and, to a lesser degree, donāt know what theyāre watching.
The most prevalent example is Volkswagenās āJump on the Wagenā campaign, in which nationals of various teams (Iceland, Brazil, Germany, Argentina, Switzerland, and so on) offer their condolences and reasons to jump on the bandwagon of their respective countries. Previously, 23andMe ran a series of ads suggesting you could get your DNA tested to āroot for your roots.ā McDonaldās posits a fun new tradition of watching the World Cup over breakfast and never knowing or caringĀ what or who youāre watching in a campaign that admittedly, gets much, much better as the plot evolves through the quarterfinals and finals spots.
Thereās another ad that features home decor, including porcelainĀ figurines of opera singers, providing additional commentary on whatever match is playing with a refrain along the lines of āeveryoneās an expert.āĀ There is a Verizon spotĀ that airs at the end of every first half of every game featuring known spokesman andĀ Silicon ValleyĀ star Thomas Middleditch announcing halftime with Landon Donovan, and either not knowing who Landon Donovan is or not knowing the U.S. didnāt qualify ā neither interpretation is particularly funny at this point. Speaking of Donovan, there is also the controversial Wells Fargo #VamosMexico ad, which bothered people for a number of reasons ranging from Ā the playerās seeming disregard for the bitter Mexico-USMNT rivalry to the companyās investment in prisons at the border.
Elsewhere in World Cup advertising, Adidas offers up only a vaguely soccer-themed ācreatorsā cameo smorgasbord thatās fun but has wildly little to do with the World Cup. (Particularly disappointing compared to the brandās āHouse Matchā and āThe Wake Up Callā 2014 spots.)
On one level, the reason the World Cup ads suck this year is very simple: These just are not good ads. Theyāre not particularly well-written or storyboarded, theyāre lazy and they donāt pay off the promise of good premises (a lack of U.S. team, a plethora of casual fans). The Volkswagen campaign isnāt a terrible idea (nor is it even bad in a salt-in-the-wound way), it just doesnāt actually make a good or fun case for why you should root for any given country. As a whole ā at least through the group phase ā the 2018 World Cup ads donāt evoke emotions, they donāt inspire, they donāt entertain. They donāt actually make you want to care about or watch the World Cup.
The more detailed theory as to why theyāre bad is that when the U.S. failed to qualify for the tournament, U.S. advertisers scrambled to rework their campaigns. Which makes sense, but also suggests these brands and their agencies were operating under the assumptions that the main appeal of the World Cup for American viewers is rooting for the U.S. (which is true) and that the presence or lack thereof of the U.S. menās team is relevant to theĀ best of World Cup U.S. advertising (which is not).
The first statement is objective fact. Ratings in the United States for the 2018 World Cup are down 44 percent. It could be much worse: In 2014, four times as many viewers watched the U.S. matchesĀ compared to any other game up through the Round of 16, so really a drop of 75 percent would not have been unexpected. (The significantly worse time change doesnāt help matters for the casual fan either.) One could make the argument that investment in the U.S. begets investment in the tournament at large and would increase viewership in the other matches. But thatās not really the issue, the issue is that advertisers were creating spots first and foremost for a specific audience of USMNT fans during those high-volume U.S. matches, and now those matches (and their defined audiences) do not exist.
Thereās no way to know what Volkswagen or Wells Fargo initially had planned, though it seems likely enough that Adidas and McDonaldās were always planning the campaigns theyāre running.
In any case, the ads that have aired so far during the World Cup all seem to share a riff on self-awareness that says we donāt have a team and we also donāt really know what weāre watching, but that doesnāt matter because weāre all in. Which is fine, but they attempt to speak to a specific (casual) American soccer fan experience,Ā that is far from clear or shared, when the best World Cup ads ā the best sports ads ā speak to a universal fan experience. The best World Cup ads, especially those from the conspicuously absent Nike, convey the emotion, fandom (patriotism) and thrill of watching your national team and your heroes succeed or fail or do cool tricks. They tell stories and set stakes. You, as a quadrennial soccer fan, donāt need to recognize the player because you, a sports fan and human, recognize the emotion.
McDonaldās does attempt to convey all this ā the feeling of getting swept up in the investment of strangers, but undercuts it with that strange ādoes it matterā line. Budweiser does all right as well, following past formulas, but goes with a drone approach that adds an unnerving dystopian air to the festivities. Nikeās solitary offering, specific to Brazil, is great, but not likely to get any U.S. airplay. Beats by Dre, with their short āThe Mixtape,ā appears to be the only brand interested in meeting the level of their 2014 ad/film, āThe Game Before the Game.ā
The best so far ā the most original, relevant and, significantly, fun ā is probably #TimeOnYourHands, from Silicon Valley shopping app Wish, which leans into the big-teams-miss-the-tournament storyline, casting a USMNT favorite along the way. A Gigi Buffon-focused spot aired during the Russia-Uruguay match on Monday morning, though the featured players both in (Neymar, Paul Pogba) and out (Robin van Persie, Gareth Bale and Tim Howard) of Russia have been sharing their respective spots on social media since mid-June.
Unfortunately, whatās airing on Fox Sports is mostly a collection of World Cup ads that seem to be lacking in the most intriguing, appealing and entertaining elements of the World Cup itself: the athletes, their sport and their various sick skills.
UPDATE:Ā TheĀ Lionel Messi-Marcelo Vieira-Toni Kroos-Carli Lloyd-Dele Alli-Giovani dos Santos Pepsi ad is also very good. Athletes: Check. Soccer: Check. Sick skills: Check. Strong music choice: Bonus check.
Anyways, here are a bunch of really fun ads from the 2014 World Cup.
And really, it could all be worse. At least the U.S. is not subject to this Maroon 5 CGI atrocity.
Next: 30 best players at the World Cup
For more from theĀ World Cup, make sure to follow FanSided and stay tuned to our soccer hub for all the latest news and results.