Fansided

3 free agents Packers could have signed with Aaron Jones’ money

By Rucker Haringey

GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN - OCTOBER 05: Aaron Jones #33 of the Green Bay Packers warms up with the football before the game against the Atlanta Falcons at Lambeau Field on October 05, 2020 in Green Bay, Wisconsin. (Photo by Quinn Harris/Getty Images)
GREEN BAY, WISCONSIN - OCTOBER 05: Aaron Jones #33 of the Green Bay Packers warms up with the football before the game against the Atlanta Falcons at Lambeau Field on October 05, 2020 in Green Bay, Wisconsin. (Photo by Quinn Harris/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
1 of 3
Next
Packers free agent rumors, Corey Linsley
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS – JANUARY 03: John Jenkins #90 of the Chicago Bears rushes against Corey Linsley #63 of the Green Bay Packers at Soldier Field on January 03, 2021 in Chicago, Illinois. The Packers defeated the Bears 35-16. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images) /

Packers fans are celebrating the team’s re-signing of Aaron Jones, but the franchise would have been better off making any of these three moves. 

Aaron Jones isn’t a bad football player, but the Packers front office should know better than to commit big-money to veteran running backs in the modern NFL. Committing $48 million to the 26-year-old running back over the next four seasons is going to make it very difficult for Green Bay to construct a roster capable of winning a Super Bowl.

It’s likely that Jones will rack up enough yards and touchdowns over the next few seasons to allow the Packers’ front office to deem the deal a success. That’s too narrow a view of the transaction. Instead, the Jones signing should be viewed in terms of its opportunity cost.

In other words, Packers fans should be concerned with what signings they couldn’t make as a result of their running back’s big deal. The following three deals are great examples of what Green Bay should have done instead.

3. Re-sign Corey Linsley

Linsley signed with the Chargers on a five-year deal with an annual average value of $12.5 million per season. It’s painfully obvious that the Packers chose Jones over retaining their All-Pro center.

Even if Linsley isn’t actually the best center in football, the Packers should have chosen to keep him in the fold. He’s critical to the team’s ability to give Aaron Rodgers a clean pocket whenever he drops back to pass. Add in Linsley’s ability to open holes for the run game and it’s easy to understand why he’s a perennial Pro Bowler.

It will be particularly interesting to see how his departure hinders Jones’ ability to produce yards on interior runs in 2021 and beyond. The Packers now need to find a high-quality replacement for Linsley via the draft or an unheralded free agent.

Home/Green Bay Packers