One of the 3,542,976 reasons the NBA is The Best isĀ the relative freedom players have to truly express themselves on and off the court. The league gives players a lot of leeway to talk, Tweet and faveĀ Instagrams ā and, you know, shoot, dunk and foul ā as a way of communicating their feelings, especially when those feelings are petty. Which is to say, Adam Silver doesnāt care aboutĀ LeBronās Halloween party decorations.
The playoffs in particular lend themselves to exceptional displays of disrespect and pettiness, which should be celebrated. Golden State and Cleveland have a semi-lock on disrespectful play, but the whole league really leans into the petty. And while this is a place to celebrate all suchĀ occasions, it isĀ also one to clearly identify them.
Disrespect, generally, involves a performative statement or a statement performance. The former might be Kevin DurantĀ and Russell Westbrook laughing at Steph Curryās defense in the 2016 Western Conference FinalsĀ and the latter might be PlayoffĀ LeBron always.
Pettiness requiresĀ honing in on one very small thing, usually a perceived slight that most people donāt notice or remember and saying or doing something delightfully extreme or incredible in response. Draymond Green tweeting āMan 3-1 sucksā when the Cleveland Indians lost the World Series was petty, so is Russā behavior, always.
Some other examples:
- The Cavaliers throttling the life out of the Celtics in Game 2 wasĀ disrespectful.
- LeBron putting up 30 points, 7 assists, 4 steals andĀ 3 blocks in that same Game 2, specifically after being snubbed as an MVP finalist, is petty.
- LeBron pretending to drink a beer courtside during Game 1 against the Raptors was disrespectful.
- (LeBron is All-NBAĀ petty and disrespectful.)
Feel comfortable with the terms? Great. Now letās look back on a few playoff events so far and evaluate: disrespectful or petty?
Steph Curry hits an exact mirror-imageĀ shot ofĀ Damian Lillardās miss in Game 2 ofĀ Warriors-Trail Blazers
There was not a lot of suspenseĀ in the Warriorsā sweep of the Portland Trail Blazers in the first round, but that just means you hadĀ toĀ find fun where you couldĀ ā like an otherwise unremarkable Curry 3-pointer.
It was the third quarter of Game 2 and the Blazers were down by 16. Dame fired up a particularly deep 3, which was not the best shot for him but it was also not the worst. It missed and Curry gotĀ the rebound. Steph brought the ball up and promptly shot and madeā¦almost the same 3.
byDeep 3s are usually disrespectful shots. Logo shots are always disrespectful shots. Out past 30 feetĀ gets slightly less disrespectful coming from Curry, because those are normal shots for him ā but the factĀ you must treat those as normal shots for him is, itself, disrespectful. A deep 3 from Curry isĀ a Russian nesting doll of disrespect.
This shot, however, had the added detail of being as close to Dameās exact shot as Curry could take without scoring on himself. Attention to detail that nearly no one else notices is a hallmark of pettiness.
Verdict: Petty.
John Wall mocks Bostonās attempted pettiness in Game 6 of Wizards-Celtics
The Wizards and the Celtics are, according to folks at SB Nation, the pettiest rivalry in the NBA. It began with a boop and grows strongerĀ any time a player on either team wears black. Of course,Ā when teams are petty in March, you can bet theyāre going to be petty in May.
The Celtics wore black to Game 6 in D.C., a call-back to when the Wizards wore black during the regular season, to indicate they would āburyā Washington in what would be an elimination game. (Black means theyāre dressed like theyāre going to a funeral, you see.) Then the Celtics lost the game.
John Wall, a recognized league-leader in pettiness, had this to add to the conversation: āDonāt come to my city, wearing all black, talking about āitās a funeral.'ā
Most importantly though, it was Wall who hit the game-winner with five seconds left. Whether intentionally petty or not, whose to say. Wall did not show up as hoped forĀ in Game 7, but he certainly hit Boston when itĀ counted.
Verdict: Petty.
The Cavaliers come out to Monstars music in Game 2 of the Eastern Conference Finals
After being soundly beaten at home Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals, Isaiah Thomas made what you would think be an innocuous comment about of the Cavaliers: āTheyāre not the Monstars.ā
Four days later, when the two teams met in Cleveland, the Cavaliers elected to enter QuickenLoans Arena to none other than the Monstarsā theme. It was delightful. But was it petty? Was it disrespectful?
This is a tricky one, because in theory, it should be a no-brainer for the petty team. The Cavs latched onto one small comment and made a whole Thing out of it. However, itās also a massive self-own. As we all know, MJ and the Tune Squad won the game ā Monstars presumably was meant to somehow designate super human villainy butĀ by also losing the game, the Cavs did not reclaim the dig, as it were. The whole metaphor was muddled from the start.
Next: The 10 greatest mustaches in NBA history
But, dabble, if you will, in another beloved NBA tradition: conspiracy theories. Imagine the Cavs threw Game 3 in order to fully commit to the Monstars bit, so confident were they that they would secure Game 4 and subsequently Game 5.
Verdict: That, friends, is both petty and disrespectful.