This is the annual first round match-up where everyone just assumes LeBron James will roll over the opposition. You can see it in the betting markets who greatly favor the Cavaliers when team stats see the series more evenly. But all things fail eventually; itās just a question of when. Cleveland absolutely created some doubts this season after some awful stretches of basketball. You could write a novella about their issues, so Iāll focus on this: what will their frontcourt rotation be? Based on pure production, it should be Larry Nance Jr., Kevin Love, and LeBron James in some situations as the power forward. Thereās also Jeff Green, who should be used sparingly as a ābig manā because of his limitations on the boards and in paint defense; itās match-up dependent.
Tristan Thompson, sadly, has fallen far; he was the starting center on their title team but they just have not been effective when heās played, due to a loss in quickness and other factors. Iām not sure how much heāll be used, but based on this season Cleveland fans are hoping itās infrequently. Reports suggest the Cavaliers will keep going small with their starters with Jeff Green and Kevin Love. That was successful, but it hasnāt been their best lineup, which you can see in the table below. Iām not saying I know for certain what will work best, but itās a question the Cavaliers need answered during the first round before the competition gets tougher.
Table: frontcourt pairs with LeBron James on court (NBAWOWY.com)
Frontcourt pair | Poss. | Off. Rating | Def. Rating |
Love-Nance | 141 | 122 | 101.4 |
Love-Thompson | 391 | 109.3 | 116 |
Love-Green | 705 | 122.7 | 116.6 |
Thompson-Nance | 0 | NA | NA |
Thompson-Green | 388 | 118 | 108.7 |
Green-Nance | 202 | 105 | 90.6 |
ā Justin Willard (@AcrossTheCourt)
Defensive matchups
As has been well-chronicled throughout the season, Victor Oladipo has emerged as a bonafide impact player ā the type that opposing teams build game plans around.
During the regular season, he averaged 23 points per game on 58 percent true shooting and 30 percent usage. Indiana had an offensive rating of 109 when he was on the floor and a mere 103 when he was off. His defensive contributions were just as (if not more) significant, so when accounting for teammates, opponents, and other factors, his Real Plus-Minus ranked in the top 10.
The Cavs had a glimpse of Oladipoās improved play during their regular-season matchup. In these four games, he scored 25 points per game on 55 percent true shooting and 30 percent usage. His 3-point percentage was somewhat higher than normal, but otherwise his performance against Cleveland was consistent with how he fared against the rest of the league.
The playoffs might be a different story, though ā or, at least, we shouldnāt be surprised if they reveal a deviation from the regular season.
The following chart shows how the Cavs matched up defensively against the Pacers to date. Each line indicates the defender who spent the most time guarding a specific offensive player on a given possession. The thicker the line, the more frequent the matchup.

JR Smith served as the primary defender on 77 percent of Oladipoās offensive possessions. If youāve been following our playoff previews, youāll likely note that such frequency is pretty high for a player outside the big-man position, and it was consistently that way from game to game.
This rate seems liable to change. Not only did the regular-season series finish before the trade deadline, when the Cavs overhauled their roster, but Smith has also recently been moved to a reserve role. Instead, Jeff Green appears slated to guard Oladipo, with head coach Tyronn Lue touting the forwardās versatility.
And who knows? Perhaps weāll see āPlayoff LeBronā in a critical defensive moment, too.
ā Positive Residual (@presidual)
Offensive styles
These charts are not meant to evaluate whether an offense is good or bad. They are designed to help illustrate how teams go about the goal of trying to put the ball in the basket. Each teamās offense is evaluated on four stylistic spectrums.
Ball movementĀ is measured with theĀ average touch time for each team, from the NBAās player tracking statistics. A lower average touch time means the ball is moving from player to player more quickly.
Player movementĀ is measured with a combination differentĀ NBA.comĀ tracking statistics, and works out toĀ average distance traveled per 24 seconds of offensive possession.
PaceĀ is measured with theĀ average length of an offensive possession fromĀ Inpredictable, a more accurate representation for how quickly a team is working than traditional pace.
Shot selectionĀ is measured with MoreyBall percentage ā in this case the percentage of a teamās true shooting opportunities that came at the rim, from the free throw line, or on a 3-pointer. Itās a generalized measure but captures something about how much each team hews to the shots that are, on average, the most efficient.
On the graph below youāll see a line for each teamās offense.Ā As the line moves away from the center of the graph on each axis youāre seeing more of that stylistic trait. For example, shot selection shows a (hypothetically) more efficient shot selection the further you are from center. Hereās how the Cavaliers and Pacers match up.

The Pacers have played a very distinct style this season. Although they score a lot in transition they donāt play at a fact pace overall, and theyāre very comfortable taking open mid-range shots. Cleveland, on the other hand, plays a style more similar to Houston ā lots of 3s, up-tempo, not much movement in the halfcourt as a dominant creator pounds the ball.
ā Ian Levy (@HickoryHigh)
Win probabilities
To project the series, I am using my in-season game projection model. The model is trained off historical game data, and accounts for rest, travel, team strength, and matchup. Since I began using the model to predict outcomes, I have been able to correctly identify the winner in about 70 percent of games.

The Cavaliers will be coming into this series as strong favorites to advance against a surprisingly strong, young Pacers team. Nearly everyone counted the Pacers out when they lost Paul George this past summer, but the team clicked and pushed for the No. 5 seed behind a star performance from Victor Oladipo. The most likely outcome of the series is Cavaliers winning in five games, occurring in over a quarter of simulations. The Pacers odds to win approach closer to one in three if they can push the series to six or seven games. There is a small chance of an upset here if playoff LeBron does not make an appearance, but look for the Cavaliers to move on to the conference semifinals after a quick, but competitive, series.
ā Jacob Goldstein (@JacobEGoldstein)